I did some digging on that cut
@Frimpong and I dont think it qualifies as a landrace. If you popped a pack of those seeds from ACE odds are you wouldnt find anything like it. People like to claim its 100% African Sativa but Phylos did some genetics testing and its closer to an 80/20 hybrid that includes some Mexican sativa and Afghani Indica to stabilize the genetics.
Most of the "landrace" strains we find stateside are actually IBLs or worked lines that were sourced from farms in their native lands. Which is honestly for the better for most of us home growers. Truly wild genetics would be really unpredictable. They are definitely out there though, especially when it comes to the asiatic sativas and stuff. Ive seen guys trying to grow some sativas from China and Southeast Asia that will go 20+ weeks and not show any amber. I still use landrace to describe strains that are endemic to particular regions, just wanted to clarify that it doesnt really mean wild cannabis genetics like mamy people assume.
Personally I feel like you have to be really dedicated if you want to work with those landrace sativas and even a lot of the heirloom hazes. Its just so much work and time. Not my cup of tea at all. Even a lot of crosses with them are too much for me.
My favorite landrace strains Ive grown to date are the Swazi Burmese from Coastal and the Bahlki I ran for the sites preservation project. The Swazi Burmese is definitely a worked line that delivered a great sativa experience in terms of effect, taste and aroma with some really unique sandalwood and floral notes in a quick flowering and easy growing form. Kind of a poor yielder though, buds were on the fluffy side by modern standards. The Bahlki was just a breeze to grow. I mean it was just insanely low maitenance. Buds were rock solid with subtle lime, earth and skunk notes. Excellent building block strain.